Current:Home > MarketsRepublican lawmaker says Kentucky’s newly passed shield bill protects IVF services -TradeGrid
Republican lawmaker says Kentucky’s newly passed shield bill protects IVF services
View
Date:2025-04-13 19:07:56
FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) — Kentucky legislation shielding doctors and other health providers from criminal liability was written broadly enough to apply to in vitro fertilization services, a Republican lawmaker said Friday as the bill won final passage.
The measure, which now goes to Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear, would accomplish what other bills sought to do to safeguard access to IVF services, GOP state Sen. Whitney Westerfield said in an interview. The other bills have made no progress in Kentucky’s GOP supermajority legislature with only a few days left in this year’s session.
Westerfield, an abortion opponent who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, said during the 37-0 Senate roll call vote that the bill’s definition of health care providers was broad enough to apply to IVF services.
“It was important to me to make that clear that providers can do what they do every day, and what moms and dads are counting on them to do every day to provide their services without fear of being prosecuted unduly,” Westerfield said in the interview afterward. “And I feel confident the bill is going to do that.”
In vitro fertilization emerged as a political issue across the U.S. in February after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that in wrongful death lawsuits in that state, embryos outside the uterus had the same legal protections as children. Major medical providers in Alabama paused IVF services until Alabama’s governor signed a quickly passed law protecting IVF providers from legal liability.
While IVF is popular, some anti-abortion advocates have been pushing to recognize embryos and fetuses as humans as a step toward banning abortion.
The Kentucky legislation — House Bill 159 — would shield health care providers from criminal liability for any “harm or damages” alleged to have occurred from “an act or omission relating to the provision of health services.” That legal protection would not apply in cases of gross negligence or when there was malicious or intentional misconduct.
The measure originated in the Kentucky House, where its lead sponsor, Republican state Rep. Patrick Flannery, said it was intended to apply to all health care providers –- including nurses, doctors and other health providers. The bill won 94-0 House passage last month.
During the House debate, supporters said their motivation was to protect frontline health workers from prosecution for inadvertent mistakes.
The legislation drew only a short discussion Friday in the Senate, and Westerfield was the only senator to raise the IVF issue.
He said afterward that he doesn’t think Kentucky courts would make the same ruling that the Alabama court did. But legislative action was important, he said, to reassure those providing IVF services that “they can keep doing their jobs” and that couples feel “safe knowing that they can go down that path knowing it’s not going to be interrupted.”
After the Alabama court ruling, Westerfield filed a bill to limit liability for health care providers if there is a loss or damage to a human embryo. That bill and a separate one to protect IVF providers from criminal liability when providing fertility services have stalled in committees.
Democratic state Sen. Cassie Chambers Armstrong, lead sponsor of the other bill, supported the measure that won final passage Friday but said she’d prefer one that’s more direct.
“It would behoove us to advance one of the bills that specifically addresses IVF, because then it is very clear,” she said in an interview.
As for the measure that passed, she said: “I do believe that this is a good bill that does have a plausible reading that would provide IVF protection. It’s not as clear as I would like, but it is a step in the right direction.”
___
Associated Press Writer Geoff Mulvihill contributed to this report from Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
veryGood! (31)
Related
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Noel and Liam Gallagher announce Oasis tour after spat, 15-year hiatus
- Robert Griffin III: 'Just really thankful' for time at ESPN after firing
- Joe Jonas Denies He's Going After Ex Sophie Turner in Post-Divorce Album
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- A ban on outdoor burning is set in 7 Mississippi counties during dry conditions
- 23 more Red Lobster restaurants close: See the full list of 129 shuttered locations
- Rob “The Rabbit” Pitts, Star of Netflix’s Tex Mex Motors, Dead at 45 After Battle With Stomach Cancer
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Utah mother and children’s book author Kouri Richins to stand trial in husband’s death, judge says
Ranking
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Ballerina Farm Influencer Hannah Neeleman Returns to Mrs. American Pageant to Crown Successor
- 'Is she OK?': Scotty McCreery stops show after seeing man hit woman in crowd
- LA to pay more than $38M for failing to make affordable housing accessible
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- As NFL's ultimate kickoff X-factor, Cordarrelle Patterson could produce big returns for Steelers
- Recovering Hawaii still on alert as Hurricane Gilma continues approach
- Score the Iconic Spanx Faux Leather Leggings for Just $33 & Flash Deals Up to 70% Off, Starting at $9!
Recommendation
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
Is Ben Affleck Dating Kick Kennedy Amid Jennifer Lopez Divorce? Here's the Truth
'I look really soft': Caitlin Clark brushes off slight ankle injury in Fever win vs. Dream
Providers halt services after court allows Florida to enforce ban on transgender care for minors
Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
Does American tennis have a pickleball problem? Upstart’s boom looms out of view at the US Open
'Only Murders' doesn't change at all in Season 4. Maybe that works for you!
EPA Thought Industry-Funded Scientists Could Support Its Conclusion that a Long-Regulated Pesticide Is Not a Cancer Risk