Current:Home > MarketsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -TradeGrid
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
Algosensey Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-11 07:46:38
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (31942)
Related
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Colorado’s Supreme Court dismisses suit against baker who wouldn’t make a cake for transgender woman
- Kelsea Ballerini Unpacks It All in Her New Album -- Here's How to Get a Signed Copy
- Dream Builder Wealth Society: Precise Strategy, Winning the Future
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Kelsea Ballerini Unpacks It All in Her New Album -- Here's How to Get a Signed Copy
- Voting systems have been under attack since 2020, but are tested regularly for accuracy and security
- Opinion: WWE can continue covering for Vince McMahon or it can do the right thing
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Video shows nearly 100 raccoons swarm woman's yard, prompting 911 call in Washington
Ranking
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- NCAA cracking down on weapon gestures toward opponents in college football
- Federal judge in Alabama hears request to block 3rd nitrogen execution
- Not all elections look the same. Here are some of the different ways states run their voting
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Dyson Airwrap vs. Revlon One-Step Volumizer vs. Shark FlexStyle: Which Prime Day Deal Is Worth It?
- Shop Amazon's October Prime Day 2024 Best Kitchen Deals & Save Up to 78% on KitchenAid, Ninja & More
- Meryl Streep, Melissa McCarthy shock 'Only Murders' co-stars, ditch stunt doubles for brawl
Recommendation
The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
If the polls just closed, how can AP already declare a winner?
Airlines say they’re capping fares in the hurricane’s path as Biden warns against price gouging
When does 'Abbott Elementary' return? Season 4 premiere date, time, cast, where to watch and stream
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
The most popular 2024 Halloween costumes for adults, kids and pets, according to Google
Supreme Court declines to hear appeal from Mississippi death row inmate
Derek Carr injury: How long will Saints quarterback be out after oblique injury?